Business

Public Relations Industry Forecasts a Series of Massive Layoffs

SACRAMENTO (AP) — Public relations firms across the country predict massive layoffs in the coming months due to recent legislation outlawing the firms’ most lucrative practices.

Hill & Knowlton’s New York office after layoffs were announced yesterday. Cutbacks have rippled through giants across the industry.

Hill & Knowlton’s New York office after layoffs were announced yesterday. Cutbacks have rippled through giants across the industry.


The new regulations carefully scrutinize government contracts with for-profit public relations companies, and apply much higher standards to public relations work overall. The new rules would have forbidden the creation of the National Smokers Alliance, a front group formed by Philip Morris with the help of P.R. giant Burson Marsteller, which presents itself as a grassroots group opposed to smoke-free laws.

The regulations would also have rendered impossible the notorious “Kuwaiti incubators” episode of 1992, in which P.R. giant Hill & Knowlton worked with the U.S. and Kuwaiti governments to galvanize public opinion in favor of the Persian Gulf War. Among other things, the firm helped stage a press conference in which a 15-year-old girl named Nayirah claimed to have witnessed Iraqi soldiers flinging Kuwaiti babies to the ground from their incubators. Nayirah was later revealed to have been performing on behalf of her father, the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the U.S. The “Kuwaiti incubator” hoax was considered decisive in turning popular opinion toward war against Iraq.

“It’s unfortunate that our hard work is being discussed under these circumstances,” said Cynthia Knowlton, granddaughter of Hill & Knowlton founder David J. Knowlton III and a spokesperson for the company.

While most industries suffered during the Iraq War, the P.R. industry remained buoyant. As overall consumer spending decreased, government spending increased, and the coffers of some private firms expanded. Of the 40 percent of Iraq War spending that went to private military contractors since the 2003 invasion, a full 10 percent is rumored to have gone to P.R. firms.

Campaigns like “Army Strong” and “Be All You Can Be” were created by private firms, and companies are even alleged to have been paid hefty sums to guarantee returning veterans prominent placement on television programs such as “Wife Swap,” “Trading Spaces,” and “Punk’d.”

One P.R. firm, MediaLink Worldwide, plans to cut its media commentator funding, a substantial portion of its budget. “We are forced to cut back, and that does mean letting excellent and qualified candidates in all fields go,” company spokesperson Fred Donahue said in an official statement. Saatchi & Saatchi, one of the largest ad firms in the world, fired over 300 employees in its Word-of-Mouth Division. Leo Burnett in Chicago is expected to release all part-time staff later this week.

It’s a vast network of influence, all crumbling down around the feet of culture producers.

“P.R. companies have been doing whatever it takes to maximize their profit,” contended media activist Ben Jefferson at a hearing which shortly preceded the passage of the new regulations. “The mystical power of the consumer isn’t going to change that — whereas the actual power of the citizen is. That’s where legislation comes in.”

21 Comments so far ...

[...] in the issue, which can also be found online, that might be of interest to the industy: “Public Relations Industry Forecasts a Series of Massive Layoffs.” Public relations firms across the country predict massive layoffs in the coming months due [...]

Pingback on November 12, 2008 10:45 am
2. Bernardo from Brazil

Guys,

This was GREAT! Congrats for the act. I hope the good news became true.

Keep the good work going.

Comment on November 13, 2008 10:06 am
3. A. Nonnie Muss

Ah, this is a nice dream. Not only to be rid of the PR people who push war and cigarettes and WalMart, but also the thousands of parasitic creeps who hype every new restaurant or store or whatever in this city to the point of making it unbearable. Every new restaurant gets hyped on the same lousy restaurant blogs in breathless fanboy language, every new boutique selling the same stupid, overpriced clothes, etc.

Comment on November 13, 2008 12:43 pm

This one sounds like Adbusters… ethics for designers, advertising companies, etc.

Comment on November 13, 2008 01:56 pm
5. Barista

PR firms should NOT be allowed to do bad things! Hopefully someone in Washington will really write a law like this!

Comment on November 13, 2008 03:51 pm

[...] to print — on a website version that also faithfully recreated the real thing — was “Public Relations Industry Forecasts a Series of Massive Layoffs. In broad brushstrokes, it speaks of well-financed PR giants hyping Philip Morris and selling [...]

Pingback on November 13, 2008 10:49 pm
7. Eugene, Ukraine

Guys, respect for your act!!!

Comment on November 14, 2008 04:34 am
8. olivier demarcellus

You people are GREAT ! The whole thing is brilliant mix of fact, hope and humor. What more can one ask! I particularly like not forgetting the death of PR in any sane alternative.
This makes me more optimistic about the US than the election of Obama…
Olivier in Geneva

Comment on November 14, 2008 09:25 am

[...] of course, there is the fake New York Times, which predicted the end of PR, as well as the Iraq War.  The prank was trying to show how the world gets better by July 2009, [...]

Pingback on November 14, 2008 07:11 pm

As a VP and CSO of a biotech marketing alliance I can sadly say I agree we need an ethical shake-up in the business of selling ideas. All ideas do not have equal merit. Eat corn, eat BT Corn and eat Babies do not all deserve equal bandwidth. If you feel this is restrictive, remember there are G, PG and R ratings for movies, there is a drivers license in your pocket (most likely, if you drive a car) and you probably pay your taxes when asked. We play team-ball on a daily basis, but should we allow a greedy lie-machine to profit from our too-busy lives. Should we let professional pimps into our living rooms, to sell us war over dinner rolls. Ethically this is needed, but I still would not want to be the one to devise the legislation… fairly.

Thank you, Yes Men, for this last, greatest spoof so far and the brilliant idea to add real commentary. There is a flurry of active debate happening on this site and I hope you will archive the commentary for our grandchildren to read. Sleep the sleep of the content Yes Men, for you are Gods Shaking the Terra, Today!

Comment on November 15, 2008 11:49 am
11. Neil

I left the PR industry about 5 years ago, shortly after being giving the Wal-Mart account. I was doing “great-work” setting up fake grass roots community organizations that supported Wal-Mart, but were totally organized by our PR firm….I couldn’t live with myself and quit shortly after.
I truly hope that someday your story becomes true and legislation around promotional ethics becomes common place.
Thanks for all the hard work you must have put into this ‘act’!
cheers
Neil - BC- Canada

Comment on November 15, 2008 01:36 pm

[...] heh, here’s what happened to your trolls.  http://www.nytimes-se.com/2009/07/04/public-r… [...]

Pingback on November 16, 2008 01:02 pm

I love your site

Comment on November 17, 2008 11:55 am
14. Tyler Durden

A tad glib and shrill on the whole knee-jerk anti-PR/advertising front, don’t you think?

Case in point: do you think our beloved 44th president would have been elected without any advertising? :-) Oh, yeah. Thought so.

So it’s only the stuff you think DOESN’T deserve to pay for media exposure that gets demonized, right? I work in advertising and my clients are alternative energy companies. Guess our budgets should be slashed too, huh?

Too bad the answers aren’t always so simple, isn’t it?

Comment on November 17, 2008 09:07 pm
15. Lewis Beyman

Under capitalism, the art of selling is the supreme virtue

The entire culture of capitalism is inherently corrupt. Honesty is one of the least valued virtues. We need to change that!!!

=

>>>Too bad the answers aren’t always so simple, isn’t it?
=

Too bad you are so disingenuous isn’t it? Each of your questions is a lie.

Comment on November 17, 2008 11:49 pm
16. Lewis Beyman

The Yes Men speak truth to power.

Comment on November 18, 2008 12:16 am
17. Sandy

There is corruption and unethical use of the media at a horrendous rate. But PR people also represent non profit organizations, help to raise money for researching new medicines and alternative energy, and help small businesses to succeed in our precious democracy. It’s those evil big guys and who they go pay -their lobbyists and mind shapers - but not the PR profession overall.

Comment on November 18, 2008 10:49 am
18. Amber

Sandy, I believe you by far have the most sensible reply in this thread. What about the news media? Objectivity has been disappearing from our news at an alarming rate, but for some reason rarely gets addressed or “blamed.” Why do PR agencies get all of the blame? I’m not saying that corruption does not exist — of course it does — but it is not only in the PR/Ad profession. Nor is it the PR people alone. PR professionals are not the root of evil in businesses or politics or organizations or individuals. Yes, there definitely have been corrupt campaigns and ads. But do not take the easy way out and just lambast PR. Consider those who hire the PR pro’s. Think of those who follow PR advice and tactics. And, like Sandy said, don’t forget about the good the PR does in many ways and for many people. If you must place blame, place it on individuals, not a profesion.

Comment on November 18, 2008 11:47 am
19. Andrew Cady

Lying “for a good cause” is still lying. When I see bad arguments, dishonest arguments, fallacious use of statistics, psychological manipulations, etc., it doesn’t matter what for; I still want to vomit. Think of the cognitive effects of all this lying: it makes our kids stupid at first, then (at best) cynical in the end. We need to recognize that the truth will not prevail through some magical force of justice, that is not in the nature of things. A world of lies results in a world of fools. The damage is permanent; there is no combating a well-publicized lie with nothing more than truth on your side. We need a cognitive environment of truth-telling; the environment we have today is saturated with advertisement, gimmickry, sophistry, lies. PR, driven as it is by the market, by efficiency, by a rationale which gives no attention to the principle of honesty, cannot be a vehicle of truth-telling. You cannot serve two masters. Deliberate speech, designed to have an effect, applying the latest techniques of mental manipulation, cannot at the same time dedicate itself to disinterested pursuit of truth.

Comment on November 21, 2008 12:07 am
20. PRperson

“Deliberate speech, designed to have an effect, applying the latest techniques of mental manipulation, cannot at the same time dedicate itself to disinterested pursuit of truth.”

I’m a couple weeks late here…but I think this deserves a response.

It’s well written, but not quite realistic. I think much more idealistic. And I would say it’s pretty “deliberate speech” that is “designed to have an effect” myself. That is what any professional adult uses in life to do what they need to do. We communicate in so many media in so many ways now that to say that people should not be deliberate with their speech is in itself dangerous. This is what diplomacy is all about and has helped countries around the world avoid or end conflict. It really is an issue of professional ethics, as well as public policy that requires full disclosure of conflicts of interest. It is also critical that media orgs do a better job of speaking truth to power, rather than just rewriting press releases. The problem is, they are the power — GE, News Corp., Viacom, etc. Probably the gravest problem here is a dying news industry that increasingly relies on repackaging corporate and government propoganda.

Comment on December 18, 2008 07:04 pm
21. USA Akbar

George Orwell, I think 1984 should have been titled 2009.

Comment on December 19, 2008 03:04 pm
(required)
(will not be published) (required)
(opitional)