Infrastructure

High-Speed Internet Hits Fast Track to Appalachia

WASHINGTON — The Internet Freedom Preservation Act has passed both houses of Congress, thanks in part to overwhelming and well-organized support of millions of Internet users. The act will ensure “net neutrality” — i.e., that all users have equal access to the Internet and that large corporations like Time Warner, AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon can no longer act as gatekeepers, determining which sites go fast and which slow.

High-speed lines connect rural counties across the U.S. with the rest of the world at no cost to the user.

High-speed lines connect rural counties across the U.S. with the rest of the world at no cost to the user.

The act also includes provisions to eliminate billions of dollars in subsidies and tax breaks for telecommunication corporations, and to use the proceeds to build a fiber-optic network providing free high-speed Internet service to even the most remote towns throughout the United States. This new network is expected to bring the U.S. up to speed with countries like Japan, France, and Korea, which have had extensive fiber-optic networks for years. The improved access for all communities is expected to help narrow education and socioeconomic gaps.

In the late 1970s, the Supreme Court ruled that companies providing communication services shouldn’t interfere with smaller users. Two years ago, that decision was reversed and the largest telecommunications companies effectively became the gatekeepers of the Internet. The Internet Freedom Preservation Act guarantees that these companies can no longer decide which Web sites on their networks go fast or slow and which won’t load at all.

“This law is a huge step forward for not only technology, but for the sharing of ideas,” said free speech advocate Lawrence Lessig, who is head of the new Network Communications Bureau, which will be charged with protecting the network against all surveillance including that of other government agencies.

22 Comments so far ...

Well it’s about time! Net Neutrality forever. This is truly a July 4th to celebrate in America.

Comment on November 12, 2008 08:14 am
2. David Bekhor

Hurray! Now time to go after the RIAA and the MPAA.

Comment on November 13, 2008 08:22 am
3. tonyw

How about a proper rail network, like they have in most other countries.

Comment on November 13, 2008 09:19 am
4. Traila Dwella

Who needs the innernet to meet girls. I just sneek into my sisters bedroom.

Comment on November 13, 2008 03:12 pm
5. Joe Plumber

I want my free service!

Comment on November 13, 2008 03:55 pm
6. Uncle Mike

This web site is dedicated to the idea of “Be the vision you wish to see in the world”. I’m inspired and cheered. Imagine, a satire that shows us a beautiful, just, safe, and happy nation and world. I say Yes! to that.

Comment on November 13, 2008 06:16 pm

[...] Coming in at the front page makes it very obvious it is a spoof paper. But some of those inner pages are deadly! [...]

Pingback on November 13, 2008 06:26 pm
8. Mizz Ludite

Hey, I think I’d prefer to see an article about how they banned cell phones and WiFi after millions died of brain cancer. The question is, why do people need these devices in the first place? We need a system that doesn’t rely on such high-tech communications–in other words a slower-paced, localized, community-based global system.

Comment on November 13, 2008 11:01 pm
9. johnny weissmüllerjo

absofuckinlutely great site! :D

Comment on November 14, 2008 08:57 am
10. DJ TOM LAROC

Lovin it!

Comment on November 14, 2008 08:59 pm
11. Brett Glass

This spoofed article contains a number of serious inconsistencies and errors. If the “Internet Freedom Preservation Act” really did provide “free” access to everyone, it wouldn’t be a “freedom preservation act” at all. It would destroy the businesses of all commercial Internet service providers, and thus the network would become the ONLY choice for Internet access. A total monopoly. (Note, by the way, that contrary to the article above, the networks in Japan, France, and Korea are not free of charge.) There would be no freedom of choice of providers. No option to buy enhanced service. And no way to get away from using a government-run network on which the government could snoop with impunity. Don’t believe for a minute that a “Network Communications Bureau” would be empowered to stop this; laws such as CALEA, the Patriot Act and the revised FISA already allow it.

Worse still, the government would be the Internet “gatekeeper.” The FCC (especially the Democrats on the Commission, who will have more power in the new Democratic administration) has already expressed a desire to create a censored, free Internet, and you can bet that if a free, government-funded network were created such censorship would be part of the deal. What’s more, if you did something that annoyed a group that was politically powerful (e.g. the movie studios or the RIAA, both of which are strongly aligned with the Democratic party), such as unauthorized downloads of copyrighted material, you would be cut off (as is being proposed in Europe). And since the network would be a monopoly (it would drive all others out of business, because they could not compete with free service), you’d have nowhere else to turn.

In short, such a network would “preserve” Internet freedom alright — in the same sense that a mummy is preserved when it is dead and gone.

Comment on November 14, 2008 10:13 pm
12. Mario the Plumber

I already spend the whole day fighting 900 pound gorillas. Do we really need another?

Comment on November 14, 2008 10:30 pm

I applaud the editors of the New York Times for their courage and vision. The New Era of Internet Preserves that will be ushered in when I take over the government will bring HD porn to every Cletus and Velma in Appalachia, which is sure to revive the capitalistic system in America and lead to world domination, peace, and security. Hallelujah Jesus! End-to-end Innernets for all!

And free ponies too, doncha know.

The Great Lessig

Comment on November 14, 2008 10:30 pm

1. The so called service providers, aka Comcast, ATT, etc… already have telephone and cable wires running throughout the whole country. They hit you with monthly fees for practically no service rendered that is not already paid for by your pre-existing telephone or cable bill. As far as email accounts and server space that is all very much available through thousands of third party venues.
2. The government has already been snooping on you.
3. The current providers mentioned above are practically monopolies already. How many choices do you have in your home town? I have one.

Comment on November 14, 2008 11:55 pm
15. Tim Woo

My leather-daddy Lessig done nailed it. The USA trails the France and the Japan in porn speed, and that just ain’right. So let’s get a warm and fuzzy feeling by taking the broadband to all the hillbillies in Appalachia. But no porn for Alaska, them people is sick.

Your pal,
Timmie!

Comment on November 15, 2008 04:39 am
16. Harold Felt

Whoohoo! In my usual snarky way, I’m gloating over the fact that the sausage factory finally produced this monstrosity (never mind that I am an Orthodox Jew and will not consume it myself). Eat death, Comcast!

Comment on November 15, 2008 04:09 pm
17. jon z-train

Timmie, Lessie, & a rabbi went into a bar & ordered some beers. Lessie’s still had the cap on it so he pitched a fit. “I want an open beer, dammit!” Timmie screamed that the FCC had better investigate, bute rabbi drank all the beers while they.were carrying on. Moral: drink gin!

Comment on November 15, 2008 11:09 pm

THIS COULD ONLY MEAN ONE THING MEN….we are all part of this.

TO ALL MY FRIENDS of the NET
TO ALL My FRIENDLY foes of the NET
TO YOU
To ME
TO THEM
TO US

THE GENERATIONAL SHIFT is in FULL JEDI FORCE

Comment on November 17, 2008 01:05 am
19. liam

Nice Jedi statement…..but that shite only works on the weak willed (like Chicago style capitialism then) I don’t think they meant “Free of Charge” I think they meant fast like France, Japan and Korea. and Free like Free from Corporate control. Sure, the government sux, but corporations suck more in this regard.

Comment on November 17, 2008 02:36 am

The Internet should be free. Requiring me to pay for Internet service is an infringement on my right to free speech. So is requiring me to pay for natural gas, because if I freeze I don’t have free speech. Come to think if it, cars and computers should be free too. Where is my free car?

Comment on November 17, 2008 08:33 pm
21. Albert Olofsson

Higher interest and no taxes is the way to go. Prosecute the Rothschilds and the rest of the AIPAC, Bernake goes back to where he came from
-Israel.

Comment on November 26, 2008 11:25 pm
22. Anomon

commentor #2 said”Hurray! Now time to go after the RIAA and the MPAA”. To acomplish this, repeal the DMCA and dissolve BayTSP and big champagne.
As for spying, try using Tor. It may also help bypass censorship, i`m not sure.
http://www.torproject.org/

Comment on November 8, 2009 03:57 am
(required)
(will not be published) (required)
(opitional)